Ok, now that I have done this correctly, I will share my very incorrect attempt. This was meant to be the *solution* to a puzzle, but that became obfuscated because of the time I spent making the word order correspond.
Behind us lies this craft untrue
Before would go to stillness through
Below you make more chaperones
Above all wake on present thrones
don’t do what house will all live in kids
LIKE(0)
So wait, did your original vision become a room 45 association/sentence assembly type puzzle with text taking the place of images? Or is this still the solution, just to a scrapped puzzle? I quite like it as a poem, either way. “Making” chaperones particularly caught me.
LIES CRAFT and UNTRUE in first sentence = trickery
numbers can be divined out of this, too, though that’s pretty unremarkable
(b4 would go 2… chaper1s)
and finally, some of these sentences seem fragmented in a way that makes me want to stitch them together. “before you wake”
LIKE(0)
Haha, I appreciate your analysis but that’s exactly the problem. It’s essentially a random, vaguely relevant “solution” (to a riddle I haven’t made yet lol) which I generated iteratively based on certain constraints. I don’t want to say too much more because if I ever finish this project I think you’ll like it. Suffice it to say there is no deeper meaning to be found here.
LIKE(0)
A nonsensical puzzle with no solution, built around unknown constraints and accompanied by confusing explanations. Seems like a pretty faithful Riddle of the Maze.
LIKE(1)
finally got my copy. flipped through it, taking in the detailed pencil art for the first time in years, savoring how the book flipped open so neatly in my hands, caught always by the deep intent with which every clue is drawn. flip to page 24 of course. there’s a sticky note there. “WTH DID I JUST TELL U! >:0″
~~~
Hi, I’m Kiki (she/her), and it’s no exaggeration to say that I’ve been lurking intermittently on this site for at least 10 years. MAZE is not for me, but it’s very good at making me think it is, and so I just keep coming back. I make videos now– not successfully or anything, I just like talking. Maybe I’ll talk about MAZE sometime.
That’s what brought me here, but I do other things too. Niche art projects, games and puzzles, lots of reading– I have spreadsheets.
youtube dot com slash at inolienkiki
or search kiki’s inner monologue
great to hear from you! I’m going to start listening to mazecast so I can catch up with the current theories situation
LIKE(1)
You should engage with MazeCast, if at all, only as a cautionary tale.
LIKE(0)
In all seriousness, MazeCast provides an accurate record of a collective descent into madness, and a partial recovery from it. Approach with caution and sympathy. You’ll see more sanity there than here, but that’s damning with faint praise.
If you really want to cultivate your Maze obsession, you might do better to join the MazeCast google hangout. I left a link in a comment on your youtube channel. The festivities await.
LIKE(0)
I’m enjoying MazeCast so far, but I’m only a few episodes in. I can absolutely sympathize with this sort of intense focus and analysis. I was glad to see that you all started out so disillusioned with most of the puzzles and particularly the main riddle- I feel similarly, but still I can’t leave.
I don’t see your comment, and I don’t think it was caught in the spam filter, so I’m not sure what happened to it. I also thought Google Hangouts had been strangled years ago but I suppose it’s the platform to be expected for discussion about the unsolvable riddles of a 40-year-old puzzle book.
LIKE(0)
I don’t see it anymore either! Hmph! I’m going to try to post it again to your recent poll.
LIKE(0)
I still don’t see it. Not even in my spam folder. YouTube must be filtering it out before I can even check. Trash website.
If you have it, maybe try my Tumblr? I think you can send asks if you don’t have an account.
tumblr dot com slash blog slash inolienkiki
LIKE(0)
It might be an efficient shortcut to just contact me from a gmail address. My gmail is vewatkin at gmail dot com. (That is, assuming you actually want to join the hangout, and aren’t just intent on reading my comments.)
LIKE(0)
I’ve been here intermittently for years too! Not lurking always, just don’t get a lot of interaction lol. I kind of feel like I get what you mean, I don’t feel the riddles are necessarily for me, as I get confused by a vast majority of the comments here, but I personally just get lost in the narrative and world of the maze. Cool to see another… I won’t say casual, as I don’t think either of us are, but just another person who engages differently.
LIKE(1)
After 4 years, I have one-and-a-half minutes of my Mazecast YTP to show for myself. Watch it and weep. Mazecast never dies!
youtube dot com slash watch?v=BqQG3Wez8Xw
I don’t really play video games but I do like to watch trailers and playthroughs of ones that catch my interest. I recently watched some videos on “The Exit 8″ and it seems like one that Maze people might enjoy.
This is quite neat! Doesn’t seem to rely on cheap scares in the same way a lot of other “backrooms” styled games do. Thank you for sharing it!
LIKE(1)
I finally read House of Leaves. I was aware of its daedalian-ness going into it, but I was surprised at its similarities with Maze. I think they’re pretty much trying to evoke the same things.
Maze is accessible and often branded a children’s book. House of Leaves is dense and unfriendly, even from the first page (“this is not for you.”) It evades rereads, even first reads. In this way, it captures the feeling of Room 24 better than Maze ever could, because many readers will get lost in it and quit in frustration. But Maze captures the feeling of Navidson’s mysterious hallway, a gate that keeps drawing you back in. I can’t imagine someone reading Maze once and then never trying again.
I got the feeling that House of Leaves was a little more confident than Maze in its unique formatting. Maze pulls its 29 gambit and doesn’t push its luck past that. I mean, it can be argued that the ergodic, decade-spanning undertaking of decrypting clues goes deeper than House of Leaves ever did. But the act of piecing together room clues is only pushed in the reader’s face in the introduction. Maze lays its mysteries out in plain sight, in objects and text that will be ignored as the rooms are navigated. You can read the book without caring about its rules. House of Leaves is unreadable in this way. You don’t discover turning it upside-down, you have to.
I loved House of Leaves. We’re all Holloways here.
I enjoyed House of Leaves a lot when I read it, enough that I was very excited to read Only Revolutions, and then very disappointed in the little bit that I read, and then curious again to finish it, and then resigned to make it all the way through, and then gratified to an extent. A decade or so down the road, it’s Only Revolutions that has stuck with me more, although maybe just because it was so much more of an ordeal.
I like Danielewski’s approach to writing more than I like his actual writing. He comes up with ambitious concepts that depend on a lot of precise decorative elements and structural commitment, and he puts in the effort to perfect those aspects. Ultimately, the structure and the ornamentation overwhelm the traditional narrative elements, which may sound like a criticism, but it’s not–if I were to describe beautiful architecture in terms of its structure and ornamentation, well, you get the point, there’s nothing wrong with that.
LIKE(1)
For the first time in years, I found one of White Raven’s hidden webpages, but I was half-asleep and didn’t save it…
Maybe it was just a dream! I remember it was some sort of dialogue between two characters
Achelous is associated with both a horn and a pitcher.
LIKE(7)
And a bull!
LIKE(5)
For my suitor was a river-god, Achelous, who in three shapes was always asking me from my father—coming now as a bull in visible form, now as a serpent, sheeny and coiled, now ox-faced with human trunk, while from his thick-shaded beard wellheads of fountain-water sprayed. In the expectation that such a suitor would get me, I was always praying in my misery that I might die, before I should ever approach that marriage-bed. But at last, to my joy, the glorious son of Zeus and Alcmena came and closed with him in combat and delivered me.
-Wikipedia
LIKE(5)
Well, I was thinking specifically of 33′s pitcher and horn, and the -on ending.
LIKE(6)
My fault, everybody. I should have asked whether we could EACH come up with a bad idea by the end of the year.
LIKE(5)
Also, “Achelous” doesn’t end with “-on.” I was thinking of Acheron, who I was reading about for some reason. I can’t even remember who Achelous is. Or Acheron.
LIKE(5)
Acheron is the river at the entrance of the underworld and Achelous is a different river, with the god Achelous being the personification of it. Achelous is related to horns and pitchers indeed (his fight with Herc/Heracles where his horn got torn off, poor guy…) but I can’t think of how Acheron would relate to 33. Though the lighting is pretty hellish
LIKE(4)
I wasn’t actually so incurious that I didn’t look “Acheron” up, but I thought it was appropriate to leave my mistake up, and receive the shame it merited.
LIKE(3)
I guess I did it more for the sake of just having the definitions of both up to think about, I don’t know… I should never doubt if you’ll validly verify veracity Vince!
LIKE(1)
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! I can’t believe INTO THE ABYSS is 8 years old, and MAZECAST is 7 years old. Time flies when you’re having fun.
Ritz, where did you go?
It turns out it is really hard to make a Riddle of the Maze type puzzle, even with MS Excel. I will try again later. No Atlas Shoulders for me.
Ok, now that I have done this correctly, I will share my very incorrect attempt. This was meant to be the *solution* to a puzzle, but that became obfuscated because of the time I spent making the word order correspond.
Behind us lies this craft untrue
Before would go to stillness through
Below you make more chaperones
Above all wake on present thrones
don’t do what house will all live in kids
So wait, did your original vision become a room 45 association/sentence assembly type puzzle with text taking the place of images? Or is this still the solution, just to a scrapped puzzle? I quite like it as a poem, either way. “Making” chaperones particularly caught me.
LIES CRAFT and UNTRUE in first sentence = trickery
numbers can be divined out of this, too, though that’s pretty unremarkable
(b4 would go 2… chaper1s)
and finally, some of these sentences seem fragmented in a way that makes me want to stitch them together. “before you wake”
Haha, I appreciate your analysis but that’s exactly the problem. It’s essentially a random, vaguely relevant “solution” (to a riddle I haven’t made yet lol) which I generated iteratively based on certain constraints. I don’t want to say too much more because if I ever finish this project I think you’ll like it. Suffice it to say there is no deeper meaning to be found here.
A nonsensical puzzle with no solution, built around unknown constraints and accompanied by confusing explanations. Seems like a pretty faithful Riddle of the Maze.
finally got my copy. flipped through it, taking in the detailed pencil art for the first time in years, savoring how the book flipped open so neatly in my hands, caught always by the deep intent with which every clue is drawn. flip to page 24 of course. there’s a sticky note there. “WTH DID I JUST TELL U! >:0″
~~~
Hi, I’m Kiki (she/her), and it’s no exaggeration to say that I’ve been lurking intermittently on this site for at least 10 years. MAZE is not for me, but it’s very good at making me think it is, and so I just keep coming back. I make videos now– not successfully or anything, I just like talking. Maybe I’ll talk about MAZE sometime.
That’s what brought me here, but I do other things too. Niche art projects, games and puzzles, lots of reading– I have spreadsheets.
Where can we find you on youtube?
youtube dot com slash at inolienkiki
or search kiki’s inner monologue
great to hear from you! I’m going to start listening to mazecast so I can catch up with the current theories situation
You should engage with MazeCast, if at all, only as a cautionary tale.
In all seriousness, MazeCast provides an accurate record of a collective descent into madness, and a partial recovery from it. Approach with caution and sympathy. You’ll see more sanity there than here, but that’s damning with faint praise.
If you really want to cultivate your Maze obsession, you might do better to join the MazeCast google hangout. I left a link in a comment on your youtube channel. The festivities await.
I’m enjoying MazeCast so far, but I’m only a few episodes in. I can absolutely sympathize with this sort of intense focus and analysis. I was glad to see that you all started out so disillusioned with most of the puzzles and particularly the main riddle- I feel similarly, but still I can’t leave.
I don’t see your comment, and I don’t think it was caught in the spam filter, so I’m not sure what happened to it. I also thought Google Hangouts had been strangled years ago but I suppose it’s the platform to be expected for discussion about the unsolvable riddles of a 40-year-old puzzle book.
I don’t see it anymore either! Hmph! I’m going to try to post it again to your recent poll.
I still don’t see it. Not even in my spam folder. YouTube must be filtering it out before I can even check. Trash website.
If you have it, maybe try my Tumblr? I think you can send asks if you don’t have an account.
tumblr dot com slash blog slash inolienkiki
It might be an efficient shortcut to just contact me from a gmail address. My gmail is vewatkin at gmail dot com. (That is, assuming you actually want to join the hangout, and aren’t just intent on reading my comments.)
I’ve been here intermittently for years too! Not lurking always, just don’t get a lot of interaction lol. I kind of feel like I get what you mean, I don’t feel the riddles are necessarily for me, as I get confused by a vast majority of the comments here, but I personally just get lost in the narrative and world of the maze. Cool to see another… I won’t say casual, as I don’t think either of us are, but just another person who engages differently.
After 4 years, I have one-and-a-half minutes of my Mazecast YTP to show for myself. Watch it and weep. Mazecast never dies!
youtube dot com slash watch?v=BqQG3Wez8Xw
I don’t really play video games but I do like to watch trailers and playthroughs of ones that catch my interest. I recently watched some videos on “The Exit 8″ and it seems like one that Maze people might enjoy.
This is quite neat! Doesn’t seem to rely on cheap scares in the same way a lot of other “backrooms” styled games do. Thank you for sharing it!
I finally read House of Leaves. I was aware of its daedalian-ness going into it, but I was surprised at its similarities with Maze. I think they’re pretty much trying to evoke the same things.
Maze is accessible and often branded a children’s book. House of Leaves is dense and unfriendly, even from the first page (“this is not for you.”) It evades rereads, even first reads. In this way, it captures the feeling of Room 24 better than Maze ever could, because many readers will get lost in it and quit in frustration. But Maze captures the feeling of Navidson’s mysterious hallway, a gate that keeps drawing you back in. I can’t imagine someone reading Maze once and then never trying again.
I got the feeling that House of Leaves was a little more confident than Maze in its unique formatting. Maze pulls its 29 gambit and doesn’t push its luck past that. I mean, it can be argued that the ergodic, decade-spanning undertaking of decrypting clues goes deeper than House of Leaves ever did. But the act of piecing together room clues is only pushed in the reader’s face in the introduction. Maze lays its mysteries out in plain sight, in objects and text that will be ignored as the rooms are navigated. You can read the book without caring about its rules. House of Leaves is unreadable in this way. You don’t discover turning it upside-down, you have to.
I loved House of Leaves. We’re all Holloways here.
I enjoyed House of Leaves a lot when I read it, enough that I was very excited to read Only Revolutions, and then very disappointed in the little bit that I read, and then curious again to finish it, and then resigned to make it all the way through, and then gratified to an extent. A decade or so down the road, it’s Only Revolutions that has stuck with me more, although maybe just because it was so much more of an ordeal.
I like Danielewski’s approach to writing more than I like his actual writing. He comes up with ambitious concepts that depend on a lot of precise decorative elements and structural commitment, and he puts in the effort to perfect those aspects. Ultimately, the structure and the ornamentation overwhelm the traditional narrative elements, which may sound like a criticism, but it’s not–if I were to describe beautiful architecture in terms of its structure and ornamentation, well, you get the point, there’s nothing wrong with that.
For the first time in years, I found one of White Raven’s hidden webpages, but I was half-asleep and didn’t save it…
Maybe it was just a dream! I remember it was some sort of dialogue between two characters
Browsing history?
Oh, so it was real. Enter “marienbad” in the URL. (Maybe this is already known to be linked somewhere, though.)
Not to my knowledge! Good work.
“For the first time in years…” what others have you found?
Can’t quite remember, but try entering “pages” in the URL too
Merry Christmas, everybody! Can we all come up with one more bad idea before the end of the year?
Achelous is associated with both a horn and a pitcher.
And a bull!
For my suitor was a river-god, Achelous, who in three shapes was always asking me from my father—coming now as a bull in visible form, now as a serpent, sheeny and coiled, now ox-faced with human trunk, while from his thick-shaded beard wellheads of fountain-water sprayed. In the expectation that such a suitor would get me, I was always praying in my misery that I might die, before I should ever approach that marriage-bed. But at last, to my joy, the glorious son of Zeus and Alcmena came and closed with him in combat and delivered me.
-Wikipedia
Well, I was thinking specifically of 33′s pitcher and horn, and the -on ending.
My fault, everybody. I should have asked whether we could EACH come up with a bad idea by the end of the year.
Also, “Achelous” doesn’t end with “-on.” I was thinking of Acheron, who I was reading about for some reason. I can’t even remember who Achelous is. Or Acheron.
Acheron is the river at the entrance of the underworld and Achelous is a different river, with the god Achelous being the personification of it. Achelous is related to horns and pitchers indeed (his fight with Herc/Heracles where his horn got torn off, poor guy…) but I can’t think of how Acheron would relate to 33. Though the lighting is pretty hellish
I wasn’t actually so incurious that I didn’t look “Acheron” up, but I thought it was appropriate to leave my mistake up, and receive the shame it merited.
I guess I did it more for the sake of just having the definitions of both up to think about, I don’t know… I should never doubt if you’ll validly verify veracity Vince!
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! I can’t believe INTO THE ABYSS is 8 years old, and MAZECAST is 7 years old. Time flies when you’re having fun.
time sucks, screw time
something something room 13…
Genuinely though that is so impressive! I really admire the dedication!